Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

Charging interest for non-payment of advance tax-MAT assessment
December, 05th 2006

Charging interest for non-payment of advance tax-MAT assessment

The Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) was liable on book profits that could be determined only after the end of the relevant previous year. Therefore, the provisions of s.207 to s.210 of the Income Tax Act 1961 were not applicable in such a case and no interest under s.234B or s.234C was leviable in case of MAT assessments.

Supreme Court 
CIT vs Kwality Biscuits Ltd.
Citation 155 Taxman 658
  195 Taxation 229
  205 CTR 122
  284 ITR 434
 
  Affirmed Kwality Biscuits Ltd. vs CIT
  243 ITR 519
  Not followed by CIT vs Geetha Ramakrishna Mills (P) Ltd.
  205 CTR 365; LexReported

S.115J, s.207, s.209, s.210, s.234B and s.234C of the Income Tax Act 1961 

Supreme Court of India

CIT vs Kwality Biscuits Ltd.

Civil Appeals Nos. 1284 and 1285 of 2001. Appeals by special leave from the judgment and order dated November 30, 1999, of the Karnataka High Court in I. T. R. C. Nos. 51 and 52 of 1996. The judgment of the High Court is reported as Kwality Biscuits Ltd. v. CIT [2000] 243 ITR 519 (Karn).

Ruma Pal and Dalveer Bhandari JJ

26 April 2006

Mohan Parasaran, Additional Solicitor-General of India (Mohit Chaudhary, Ms. Sushma Suri and B. V. Balram Das, Advocates, with him) for the Appellant
Dhruv Mehta, Harsh Vardhan Jha and Yasraj Singh Deora, Advocates, for the Respondent

ORDER

The appeals are dismissed.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting