Tax sops to units in hill states may go Tax sops to units in hill states may go Chartered Accountant CA ICAI Chartered Accountants CA ICAI CAinINDIA ICAI Announcements Accounting Standards CA News ICAI Students ICAI Members Case Laws CPT IPCC Final ICAI Course CA Course ICAI Forum CA Question Papers ICAI Study Material

« Top Headlines »

Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
How to check income tax return (ITR) status
Income tax rules: How much cash can you receive in one day to avoid an I-T notice?
Tax saving tips: How you can reduce tax burden under the new regime
Condonation of delay under section 119(20) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in filing of Form No. 9A/10/108/10BB for Assessment Year 2018-19 and subsequent assessment years
Condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in filing of Form No. 10-IC or Form No. 10-ID for Assessment Years 2020-21, 2021-22 and 2022-23
New GST form notified to help taxpayers adjust tax demand amount: Here's how to use
ITR filing deadline extended to November 15, 2024 for these taxpayers


« Govt hints at big tax sops for key export sectors...	Good response to ICAI`s new curriculum... »
Tax sops to units in hill states may go

December, 22nd 2006
The finance ministry is likely to do away with area-based tax concessions in Budget 2007-08. This will jolt Himachal Pradesh and Uttaranchal, which have attracted huge investments to the consternation of neighbours Punjab and Haryana. A finance ministry official said, With no other means of enhancing revenues, we will need to contain the number of area-based exemptions. Such benefits to industry had cost the exchequer Rs 1,500 crore in 2004-05. The finance ministry was planning to restrict the number of tax exemptions for Uttaranchal and Himachal Pradesh, which were extended up to 2007-08, while withdrawing several indirect tax sops. The move would put these two states at par with their neighbours. After the Budget, new units and expansion by existing units in Uttaranchal, Himachal and Kutch in Gujarat would not be eligible for tax breaks. The Centre was in a bind after Punjab and Haryana sought similar incentives to prevent existing industries in these states from shifting to Himachal and Uttaranchal. They claimed that exemptions had turned Baddi, an industrially-backward area in Himachal, into a pharmaceutical and textile hub, while auto companies now preferred Uttaranchal. NO FREE LUNCH Area-based tax benefits cost the govt Rs 1,500 cr in 04-05 Punjab, Haryana sought incentives similar to HP, Uttaranchal Sops to J&K and the Northeast likely to be retained Even Gujarat and Tamil Nadu wanted the ministry to do away with area-based sops having lost a number of pharma investments in their region to the two hill states. Industries in the two hill states enjoy a number of sops, including a ten-year excise holiday and 100% income-tax waiver for the first five years. Besides, new units can also avail of a 15% capital investment subsidy on a maximum of Rs 30 lakh. The government was, however, likely to retain the sops offered by Jammu & Kashmir and the Northeastern states because of their special status. The move to axe area-based exemptions is in line with the ministrys intention to prune tax sops so that deficit targets could be met.