News shortcuts: From the Courts | Top Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | Professional Updates | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Top Headlines »
 M/s Nalini Jewellers, 16/2646-49, Bank Street, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-33(1), New Delhi.
  Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions (1st Amendment), Rules, 2019
 Income Tax Return filing: How to disclose foreign income, assets in ITR
 Missed Income Tax Deadline? Learn How To Prepare And Submit A Belated Return
 Not received income tax refund yet? Here is how much interest you will get
 Notification No. 100/2019 Central Board of Direct Taxes
 How to prepare for the new GST return filing systema
 Notification No. 99/2019 Central Board of Direct Taxes
  Master Circular – Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana - National Rural Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NRLM)
 Follow these Income Tax investment options to become rich and enjoy wealthy life
 How to file a revised ITR and avoid rejection or penalties

'Audit was done within existing rules' - Satyam
January, 09th 2009

In its first official stand on the infamous Satyam fraud, accounting firm Pricewaterhouse on Thursday defended itself, saying it
conducted the audits "in accordance with applicable auditing standards."

"Pricewaterhouse are the statutory auditors of Satyam. The audits were conducted by Pricewaterhouse in accordance with applicable auditing standards and were supported by appropriate audit evidence," the firm said in a statement here.

However, it refused to share any further details on the matter.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2019 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting