sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Plot No. 1, Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj, vs. DCIT, Circle- 16(1), Room No. 312, C.R. Building New Delhi.
 Smt. Ritu Malik T-236, DB Gupta Road, Phara Ganj, New Delhi – 110055 vs. ITO, Ward – 62 (5) New Delhi
 Fluor Daniel India Pvt. Ltd. B 9, LGF Green Park (Main) New Delhi 110 016 vs. ACIT Circle 9(1), Room No.194 C.R.building I.P.Estate New Delhi
 DCIT, Circle-2, Meerut. vs. Reeta Singhal, A-312, Prahlad Vatika, Khair Nagar, Meerut.
 Contata Solutions Pvt.Ltd. A-16/9, Vasant Vihar New Delhi 110 057 vs. ITO, Ward 6(3), Room No.376A Central Revenue Building I.P.Estate New Delhi 110 002
 Late Sh. D. K. Jain Through Legal Hier Mrs. Usha Jain D-19, Nizamuddin East New Delhi vs. DCIT Circle-32(1) New Delhi.
 Shri Neeraj Puri 74-C, Rajpur Road Dehradun Vs. The Pr. C.I.T Dehradun
 Ashok Kumar S/o Sh. Hari Kishan Hingo Kheri, Kandela D- Shamli vs. ITO, Ward – 1 (4) Shamli
 Satish Kumar, Rra Taxindia, D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi – 49 Vs. Ito, Ward 2(3), Faridabad
 Income-tax Officer, Ward 6(1), New Delhi vs. Magic Software Pvt. Ltd., 9th Floor, Tower C, Tech Bouleward, Plot No. 6, Sector 127, Noida.
 Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax

The Sonepat Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd., Sonepat. Vs. DCIT, Sonepat Circle,Sonepat.
January, 08th 2015
           IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                DELHI BENCHES : H : NEW DELHI

      BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, AM AND SHRI A.T. VARKEY, JM

                       ITA No.5936/Del/2010
                     Assessment Year : 2007-08

The Sonepat Coop. Sugar           Vs.   DCIT,
Mills Ltd.,                             Sonepat Circle,
Sonepat.                                Sonepat.

PAN: AAAAT0959N


     (Appellant)                           (Respondent)

              Assessee By     :    None
              Department By   :    Shri J.P. Chandrakar, Sr.DR

                                  ORDER

PER R.S. SYAL, AM:

       This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order passed

by the CIT(A) on 19.10.10 in relation to the assessment year

2007-08.


2.       The only ground raised in this appeal is against the

confirmation of addition of `1,83,034/- on account of Local Area

Development Tax not paid before the due date of filing the return

of income.
                                                       ITA No.5936/Del/2010







3.   Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee, a

cooperative    sugar   mill,   claimed   deduction   for   Local    Area

Development Tax of `1,83,034/- and equal amount was shown as

payable in its balance sheet. Since the said amount was not paid

before the due date of filing the return, the AO, impliedly invoking

the provisions of section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961

(hereinafter also called `the Act'), made disallowance for the said

sum. The ld. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance and also directed the

AO to allow deduction for a sum of `93,338/-, being the amount

paid on 18.8.2006 allowed as per the order of the CIT(A) for the

AY 2006-07. The assessee is aggrieved this disallowance.


4.   We have heard the ld. DR and perused the relevant material

on record. None appeared from the side of the assessee despite

notice during the course of hearing.       However, someone came

immediately after the conclusion of hearing to submit that the

very payment of the Local Area Development Tax is under

challenge before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the matter is

still sub judice.




                                   2
                                                    ITA No.5936/Del/2010


5.   In view of the fact that the amount was payable as at the

end of the year in its balance sheet implies that the assessee

claimed deduction for this sum in its Profit & Loss Account. As per

the mandate of section 43B, deduction can be allowed for such

sum only subject to the payment latest by the due date for filing

the return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act. Since the amount was

not paid by the assessee before the due date of filing the return,

in our considered opinion, the authorities below were justified in

making and sustaining its disallowance u/s 43B.    In so far as the

contention about the amount possibly not becoming payable by

virtue of the likely judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, we

find that if the amount turns out to be not payable, then, there

can be no question of deduction also. The disallowance u/s 43B

proceeds on the premise that the assessee initially claims

deduction which is not allowable because of the non-payment of

tax, duty or fees etc., before the due date. Whatever may be the

circumstance, the amount disallowed by the AO would require

addition in respect of the claim for deduction made by the

assessee in respect of the said sum for the year in question. We,








                                 3
                                                           ITA No.5936/Del/2010


therefore, do not propose to interfere with the impugned order on

this score.


6.        In the result, the appeal is dismissed.


          The order pronounced in the open court on 07.01.2015.

               Sd/-                                          Sd/-

       [A.T. VARKEY]                                    [R.S. SYAL]
     JUDICIAL MEMBER                                ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated,        January, 2015.

dk

Copy forwarded to:

     1.   Appellant
     2.   Respondent
     3.   CIT
     4.   CIT (A)
     5.   DR, ITAT

                                                     AR, ITAT, NEW DELHI.




                                      4

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2019 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Bath SEO Company Birmingham SEO Company Bradford SEO Company Brighton and Hove SEO Company Bristol SEO Company Cambridge SEO Company Canterbury SEO Company Carlisle SEO Company Chester SEO Company Chichester SEO Company Coventry SEO Compan

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions