Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court

Confederation of Indian Industry 23-26, Institutional area Lodhi road, New Delhi vs. ITO(E), Trust Ward III New Delhi
March, 25th 2014
                 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                     DELHI BENCHES : "B" NEW DELHI

                      BEFORE SHRI U.B.S.BEDI, JM
                                 AND
                      SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM

                         ITA no. 2189/Del/2013
                        Assessment Year : 2007-08

Confederation of Indian Industry    vs.     ITO(E), Trust Ward III
23-26, Institutional area                   New Delhi
Lodhi road, New Delhi

PAN: AAAT CO 188 R

(Appellant)                                       (Respondent)


                           Appellant by:- None
                  Respondent by:- Sh. Gagan Sood, Sr.D.R.


                                   ORDER

PER J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM

     This appeal filed by the assessee, is directed against the order of the

Ld.Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXI, New Delhi dated 04.02.2013

pertaining to the Assessment Year 2007-08.


2.   On the date of hearing i.e. on 19.03.2014, none appeared on behalf of

the assessee, nor any adjournment application was received inspite of service

of notice to the assessee much well in advance.    We find from the record that

on earlier occasions, the appeal has      been adjourned on the request of the

assessee. Hence we presume that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting

these appeals.
                                                                     Page 2 of 3







3.     Following the decisions in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India P.Ltd. 38

ITD, 320 (Delhi), and the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the

case of M/s Chemipol vs. UOI and others in Central Excise Appeal No.

62/2009 judgement dt. 17th September,2009,        we consider it a fit case for

dismissing the appeal in limine, as not admitted. We may like to clarify that

subsequently, if the assessee explains the reasons for non-appearance and if

the Bench is so satisfied, the matter may be recalled for the purpose of

adjudication of the appeal.



4.     In the result, the     appeal by the assessee stands dismissed for non

prosecution.



Order pronounced in the Open Court on 19th March, 2014.



                Sd/-                                   Sd/-

       (U.B.S. BEDI)                         (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY)
     JUDICIAL MEMBER                        ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: the 19th March,2014

*manga
                                                                 Page 3 of 3









Copy of the Order forwarded to:
  1. Appellant; 2.Respondent; 3.CIT; 4.CIT(A); 5.DR; 6.Guard File

                                                 By Order




                                               Asst. Registrar

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting