Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Service Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 6 Ways to Save Income Tax On New & Old Tax Regime for FY 2023-24
 Income Tax SFT return filing due date extension: Facility to remain open for a couple of days Latest news
 Income tax filing: Waiting for your Form 16? Here is what you need to know
 Salaried? Rental tax calculation rules you should know before ITR filing in 2023
 What are new tax regime's slabs? Know its limits, benefits, and more
 How much additional tax do you need to pay? ITR filing last date for FY 2019-20
 Income Tax Return Filing: How to file ITR - step-by-step guide
 New Income Tax Slabs for Super Senior Citizens 2023-24: Which rate will apply for ITR now?
 Income Tax Return filing 2023 data: How many Indians aged 18-35 years file ITR?
 Make tax-saving a part of your overall investment plan
 Filing ITR? Maximize Your Tax Savings With These 7 Allowance Benefits

Govt planning watertight tax rules for global online firms
March, 11th 2016

India, among the first countries to impose an equalization levy to tax the digital economy, is looking at framing watertight regulations to ensure that global online businesses that earn considerable revenue from India are taxed in the country.

The 6% levy announced in the budget is structured in a way to ensure that every entity making a payment to the non-resident for online advertisements will have to deduct this tax before making the payment.

This means that even if the payments are routed through Indian arms of the global companies through back-to-back service contracts, the entity which is making the final payment from India will have to deduct the tax.

Also, to ensure that there are no constitutional challenges, as well as conflicts with India’s existing tax treaties with other countries, this levy has not been included in the Income Tax Act. It instead finds a place in the finance bill. This will make it difficult for global firms to claim tax credit from foreign governments for the levy.

Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc., Twitter Inc. and other online digital portals that get significant online advertisement revenues from India are expected to be impacted by this levy.

Spokespersons for the three firms declined to comment.

“We’ve studied business models in India, and this so-called Google tax is structured in a way that it suits those models. The business models that major foreign digital companies operating in India follow is by having a subsidiary in India which is a service provider or service centre and income flows through that subsidiary to the parent abroad,” said a senior income tax department official, who did not wish to be identified.

“If an Indian business entity is making a payment to the Indian subsidiary of the foreign company, then there is no levy on that payment. But if that subsidiary remits that money abroad, then that levy kicks in,” the official said.

The official pointed out that the principle behind the levy is to ensure that domestic and foreign entities undertaking the same business activity in India are taxed broadly at similar levels.

“At present, the Indian company that provides such services will be subject to 30% tax on a net basis. But if a foreign company provides the same services, it claims not to be liable to pay tax in India,” the official said.

Finance minister Arun Jaitley, in his budget speech last month, announced the introduction of the equalization levy for any payment that exceeds Rs.1 lakh a year from an Indian company to a non-resident.

“The Indian tax department is looking to bring in a levy where any payment to a non-resident towards online advertising is taxed in India. It flows from action point one of the base erosion and profit shifting guidelines that talks about taxing the digital economy, and follows the concept of taxing those entities which are in essence stateless and do not pay taxes anywhere in the world,” said Mukesh Butani, non-executive chairman of BMR Advisors and managing partner of BMR Legal.

“India is among the first to implement this, and many foreign technology companies are anxious to see how this levy pans out, and if other countries will follow India’s example and bring such a levy,” he said.

“Taxing companies with no permanent establishment in India would have been in conflict with India’s double taxation avoidance agreements with other countries. That it is why the government has made it a part of the finance bill,” he said.

“The idea is that India should get a share of the global digital economy since many online portals earn a substantial amount of revenue from India,” said Rahul Garg, who leads the direct tax practice at PwC India.

“Many of the Indian arms of these foreign companies enter into contracts with the Indian advertiser while simultaneously entering into a contract with the parent,” said Garg, adding that most of the advertising revenue flows to the foreign parent entity.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting