Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Direct Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Govt kicks off direct tax code revision
 ITR 2024 25 Check tax department s update on TDS and refunds
 Income Tax: Why did some taxpayers receive notice for discrepancy in house rent receipt? IT Dept explains
 Income tax exemption: 4 financial instruments you can still invest into before March 31
 CBDT drops small tax demands but not TCS, TDS claims
 ITR Refund: Awaiting money from Income Tax? Here's why you have not yet received your amount
 Income Tax Notice: What to do if you receive a Section 143 (1) notice from taxman?
 Average tax return processing time cut to 10 days: CBDT
 7 types of Income Tax Notice ITR filers may receive for AY 2023-24
 ITR filing: Do these advance preparations before filing your income tax return
 What are the strategies to maximize tax refunds after submitting an income tax return (ITR)?

Tax demand on Vodafone, Cairn cannot be disputed: CBDT
March, 02nd 2016

Asserting that the tax demand against them has been “rightly generated”, the Central Board of direct Taxes (CBDT) on Tuesday said companies such as Vodafone and Cairn Energy should promptly avail the one-time dispute resolution scheme announced in the budget to close the issue by paying the principal tax and getting waiver on interest and penalty.

CBDT chairman Atulesh Jindal said “as long as” the retrospective amendment of the I-T Act passed by Parliament remains valid, the “demand (of tax against them) remains valid.”

Jindal said apart from UK’s Vodafone Group and Cairn Energy, there are about a dozen more such companies which are facing similar demands due to the retrospective amendment of the Income-Tax Act.

“They (companies) are basically challenging the retrospective amendment. Retrospective amendments have been passed by Parliament. They have not gone against passing of retrospective amendment before any court...so, as long as the retrospective amendment is valid, the demand remains valid. Of course, it (demand) very much remains and this is a rightly generated demand,” he said.

Finance minister Arun Jaitley, in his budget speech on Monday, announced a new dispute resolution mechanism for such companies. “In order to give an opportunity to the past cases which are ongoing under the retrospective amendment, I propose a one-time scheme of dispute resolution for them,” Jaitley said.

The scheme entails paying up of the principal tax by the company and at the same time getting a waiver on interest and penalty.

The CBDT chief said the government has always made it clear that tax disputes “are not” covered under the Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (BIPA).

The department cannot go back on the tax demand raised against these firms as assessment orders were “already passed” and “demands raised” before the I-T Act was amended retrospectively, he added.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting