sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 Anupam Sushil Garg, S/o Shri Vijay Garg, C/o Venus Cinema, Railway Road, Saharanpur. vs. Income-tax Officer, Ward-2, Saharanpur.
 Oriental Building & Furnishing Co.Ltd. C/o. Ravi Gupta, Advocate E-6A, Kailash Colony New Delhi vs. DCIT Circle-13(1) New Delhi.a
 Housing Board Haryana, Panchkula, Haryana
 Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited, Multi Location, Multi State
 Ranjana Sen Gupta Raghavan, H-1592, Chittaranjan Park, New Delhi-110019 vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-71(2), New Delhi
 M/s Sony India Private Limited A-31 , Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate New Delhi -44 vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income tax , Circle 24 (1), New Delhi
 Manik Singh S/o. Dr. Meharban Singh, A-47, Sector-31, Noida Uttar Pradesh Noida vs. DCIT Room No. 408, 4th Floor, A- 2D, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector-24 Noida
 Nikon India ( P ) Ltd plot number 71, sector 32, institutional area Gurugram Haryana vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income tax , Circle 3, Gurugram
 Coal India Limited, Ranchi, Jharkhand
 Arun Kumar vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 PCIT vs. Shodiman Investments Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)

Income Tax department demands rupees 10 crore
June, 23rd 2009

In fresh trouble for Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati, the Income Tax Department has filed two appeals in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) demanding additional tax of about Rs 10 crore for her income for the financial years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007.

The income includes gifts received by BSP supremo Mayawati from her party workers on her birthday.

For the financial year 2005-2006, the Chief Minister had declared her income as Rs 1.59 crore but the Income Tax Department assessed her income at Rs 4.34 crore and demanded a tax of Rs 1.2 crore.

For the financial year 2006-2007, she showed her income as Rs 2.45 crore but the department assessed her income at Rs 22 crore and demanded an income tax of Rs 9 crore.

The Income Tax Department had challenged the two orders of Commissioner of Income Tax dated April 15 and April 30, 2009 vide which the commissioner did not allow the department to raise additional demand of tax on additional income of over Rs 20 crore which was reportedly collected by her on her birthday, which was celebrated as "arthik sahyog diwas"(economic assistance day), in the form of gifts from her party workers and well wishers.

The income from gifts is being treated by the department as income from her vocation of politics.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Experience

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions