Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

Income Tax department demands rupees 10 crore
June, 23rd 2009

In fresh trouble for Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati, the Income Tax Department has filed two appeals in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) demanding additional tax of about Rs 10 crore for her income for the financial years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007.

The income includes gifts received by BSP supremo Mayawati from her party workers on her birthday.

For the financial year 2005-2006, the Chief Minister had declared her income as Rs 1.59 crore but the Income Tax Department assessed her income at Rs 4.34 crore and demanded a tax of Rs 1.2 crore.

For the financial year 2006-2007, she showed her income as Rs 2.45 crore but the department assessed her income at Rs 22 crore and demanded an income tax of Rs 9 crore.

The Income Tax Department had challenged the two orders of Commissioner of Income Tax dated April 15 and April 30, 2009 vide which the commissioner did not allow the department to raise additional demand of tax on additional income of over Rs 20 crore which was reportedly collected by her on her birthday, which was celebrated as "arthik sahyog diwas"(economic assistance day), in the form of gifts from her party workers and well wishers.

The income from gifts is being treated by the department as income from her vocation of politics.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting