sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 GE Energy Parts Inc vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 PCIT vs. Perfect Circle India Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Plot No. 1, Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj, vs. DCIT, Circle- 16(1), Room No. 312, C.R. Building New Delhi.
 Smt. Ritu Malik T-236, DB Gupta Road, Phara Ganj, New Delhi – 110055 vs. ITO, Ward – 62 (5) New Delhi
 Fluor Daniel India Pvt. Ltd. B 9, LGF Green Park (Main) New Delhi 110 016 vs. ACIT Circle 9(1), Room No.194 C.R.building I.P.Estate New Delhi
 DCIT, Circle-2, Meerut. vs. Reeta Singhal, A-312, Prahlad Vatika, Khair Nagar, Meerut.
 Contata Solutions Pvt.Ltd. A-16/9, Vasant Vihar New Delhi 110 057 vs. ITO, Ward 6(3), Room No.376A Central Revenue Building I.P.Estate New Delhi 110 002
 Late Sh. D. K. Jain Through Legal Hier Mrs. Usha Jain D-19, Nizamuddin East New Delhi vs. DCIT Circle-32(1) New Delhi.
 Shri Neeraj Puri 74-C, Rajpur Road Dehradun Vs. The Pr. C.I.T Dehradun
 Ashok Kumar S/o Sh. Hari Kishan Hingo Kheri, Kandela D- Shamli vs. ITO, Ward – 1 (4) Shamli
 Satish Kumar, Rra Taxindia, D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi – 49 Vs. Ito, Ward 2(3), Faridabad

ITAT members banned
June, 26th 2009

The ministry of law and justice has banned retired members of Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), a quasi judicial body on tax matters, from appearing before the tribunal, post-retirement.

Senior income-tax officials and tax professionals welcomed the move, as it puts an end to a practice that often creates embarrassing situations during the hearing of tax cases. Quite often, lawyers and chartered accountants had to put up with situations in which a member who presided over the hearing of a case, reappears at the same forum after retirement to defend one of the parties in the same case.

The law ministry has also banned presidents and senior vice-presidents of ITAT, from appearing before the Tribunal.
YP Trivedi, senior tax lawyer and member of Parliament welcomed the ministry's decision of banning such practices. "Creation of such protocol would lead to better judicial discipline and enhancement of the prestige of the institution of ITAT," he said.

The issue first came up when members of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) were banned from practising before CESTAT, after retirement, by a provision introduced in the Customs and Excise Act, in the 2007 Budget.

Critics of the proposal questioned the practice of ITAT members appearing before the Tribunal after retirement.
Four retired CESTAT members had challenged the provision in the Customs and Excise Act before the Delhi High Court.

While dismissing the petition, the court, in its April 2009 order, had observed that the "...court's authority is based on public perception especially that of the litigants appearing before it, that the process of administration of justice is far removed, from even the remotest possibility of bias creeping into the decision making process."

Senior income-tax officials said the practice of officers belonging to the elite Indian Revenue Service cadre appearing before the Tribunal after retirement too, should be banned. There were instances where the officer who presided over the assessment of tax payer, appeared, after his retirement, on behalf of the tax payer.

YP Trivedi, senior tax lawyer and member of Parliament welcomed the ministrys decision of banning such practices. "Creation of such protocol would lead to better judicial discipline and enhancement of the prestige of the institution of ITAT."

"This change will curb the prevailing tendency of some individuals becoming members in the Tribunal with a view to resign later and take the advantage of the context made earlier, while on the bench," says Dinesh Vyas, senior tax counsel.

But K Shivram, vice president of ITAT Bar Association said: "The experience and knowledge of a judge is an asset to the nation's delivery system...it is important to retain knowledge and experience of the judiciary to deliver speedy justice."

According to Mr Shivaram, the age limit of the Supreme Court and High Court judges should be raised to 68 years and 65 years, from 65 years and 62 years, respectively.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2019 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
SEO Services SEO LLC e-boost Search Engine Optimization Services Internet Marketing Services Website Placement Services On-site Webs

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions