Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

M/s Castrol India Limited,Technopolis Knowledge Park,Mahakali Caves Road,Chakala, Andheri (East)Mumbai 400093. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 8(3),Aayakar Bhavan,M.K. Road,Mumbai 400 020.
June, 14th 2012
           IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                MUMBAI BENCHES " C ", MUMBAI

          BEFORE SHRI DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL, JM
                 AND SHRI RAJENDRA, A.M.

                     ITA No. : 8191/Mum/2010
                     Assessment Year : 2005-06

M/s Castrol India Limited,                     Dy. Commissioner of Income
Technopolis Knowledge Park,                    Tax, Range 8(3),
Mahakali Caves Road,                           Aayakar Bhavan,
Chakala, Andheri (East)              Vs.       M.K. Road,
Mumbai ­ 400093.                               Mumbai ­ 400 020.
PAN NO: AAACC4481E
          (Appellant)                                  (Respondent)

                     Appellant by          :    None
                   Respondent by           :    Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

                   Date of hearing         :    12-6-2012
           Date of Pronouncement           :    12-6-2012


                              ORDER


PER DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL, JM :


     This appeal preferred by the assessee is directed against the

order dated 27-09-2010 passed by the ld. CIT(A)- 15, Mumbai for the

assessment year 2005-06.







2.   In this case, the notice of date of hearing fixing the appeal for

12-6-2012 sent to the assessee by RPAD was duly received by the

assessee as per AD Card available on record. However, at the time of

hearing, none was present on behalf of the assessee nor filed any
                                    2
                                                 ITA No : 8191/Mum/2010


application for adjournment of the case. It appears that the assessee is

not interested in pursuing the appeal. It has been held by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of B.N. Bhattachargee and Anr. (118 ITR

461) (at pages 477/478) that appeal does not mean only filing of memo

of appeal but also pursuing it effectively. In cases where the assessee

does not want to pursue the appeal, Court/Tribunal have inherent

power to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution as held by the Hon'ble

Bombay High Court in the case of M/s. Chemipol vs. Union of India in

Excise Appeal No. 62 of 2009. We are convinced that the assessee is

not interested in prosecuting the appeal. We, therefore, dismiss the

appeal of the assessee as unadmitted.


3.    The assessee shall, however, be at liberty to approach the

Tribunal for recalling of this order, if prevented by sufficient cause for

non-appearance on the date of hearing.







4.    In the result, the assessee's appeal stands dismissed.


      Order pronounced in the open court on 12th day of June, 2012.



                Sd/-                                  Sd/-

         ( RAJENDRA )                    ( DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL )
     ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                        JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai, Dt: 12.06.2012.
                                  3
                                              ITA No : 8191/Mum/2010



Copy   forwarded to :
  1.    The Appellant,
  2.    The Respondent,
  3.    The C.I.T.
  4.    CIT (A)
  5.    The DR,     - Bench, ITAT, Mumbai

                  //True Copy//
                                                 BY ORDER



                                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                                      ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai
RK
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting