Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xi Vs. M/s. Dlf Commercial Project Corporation Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xi Vs. M/s. Dlf Commercial Project Corporation Chartered Accountant CA ICAI Chartered Accountants CA ICAI CAinINDIA ICAI Announcements Accounting Standards CA News ICAI Students ICAI Members Case Laws CPT IPCC Final ICAI Course CA Course ICAI Forum CA Question Papers ICAI Study Material

« From the Courts »

Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
Allahabad HC Orders GSTN to Modify Portal within 1 Month to Allow Appeals Even When Disputed Tax Shows Nil
Statement Recorded By High Courts Can't Be Later Contradicted By Counsel : Supreme Court
Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
[Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court


« Rampgreen Solutions Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax...	ACIT, Circle 1 Meerut Vs. Sh.Harish Kumar Bansal C/o... »
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xi Vs. M/s. Dlf Commercial Project Corporation

August, 22nd 2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 24.03.2015 Pronounced on: 15.07.2015 + ITA 507/2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XI..................Plaintiff Versus M/S. DLF COMMERCIAL PROJECT CORPORATION .................Respondent Through: Sh. P. Roy Chaudhuri, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue in ITA 627/2012 and Sh. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue in ITA 507/2013. Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha and Sh. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates, for the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % For detailed judgment, the decision dated 15.07.2015 in ITA 627/2012 may be referred to. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) R.K. GAUBA (JUDGE) JULY15, 2015 ITA 507/2013 Page 1