Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

Bhoopender Singh, 83, Girdhar Enclave, GT Road, Near-IME College, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad. Vs. ITO, Ward-1(2), Ghaziabad.
August, 27th 2015
         IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
             DELHI BENCH : SMC-I : NEW DELHI

     BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                           ITA No.237/Del/2014
                         Assessment Year : 2008-09

Bhoopender Singh,                      Vs.   ITO,
83, Girdhar Enclave,                         Ward-1(2),
GT Road, Near-IME College,                   Ghaziabad.
Sahibabad,
Ghaziabad.

PAN: ASLPS5382C

     (Appellant)                               (Respondent)

           Assessee by : Shri Rajesh Malhotra, CA
           Deptt. by   : Shri R.S. Negi, Sr.DR

           Date of Hearing      : 24.08.2015
           Date of Pronouncement: 26.08.2015

                                   ORDER

     This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the

CIT(A) on 19.9.2013 in relation to the assessment year 2008-09.


2.   The only issue raised in this appeal is against the addition of

Rs.3,16,518/- made by the AO u/s 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

(hereinafter also called `the Act').
                                                                ITA No.237/Del/2014   2







3.    Shorn of unnecessary details, it is noticed that the assessee could not

file complete evidence before the AO which led to the making of this

addition. An application was filed before the ld. CIT(A) for furnishing

additional evidence, which fact is borne out from page 4 of the impugned

order. The ld. CIT(A) has recorded in his order that the assessee was

allowed time upto 11.9.2013 for filing additional evidence, which the

assessee failed to produce. This resulted into confirmation of addition

made by the AO u/s 68 of the Act.


4.    The case of the assessee is that the ld. CIT(A)'s regular posting is in

Muzafar Nagar and he came on camp to Ghaziabad, where the assessee's

appeal was also listed. The ld. AR submitted that though the ld.CIT(A)

gave time upto 11.9.2013 for filing the additional evidence, but on that date

when the assesee reached there, it was found that no such camp was there in

Ghaziabad. Without providing any further opportunity to the assessee, the

ld. CIT(A) disposed of the appeal.


5.   In my considered opinion, the ends of justice would meet adequately if

the impugned order on this issue is set aside and the matter is restored to the

file of AO for deciding this issue afresh as per law, after affording
                                                                 ITA No.237/Del/2014   3


reasonable a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

Needless to say, the assessee will be at liberty to lead any fresh evidence

before the AO in such fresh proceedings.







6.    In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical

purposes.

      The decision was pronounced in the open court on 26th August,

      2015.


                                                      Sd/-
                                                 (R.S. SYAL)
                                           ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 26th August, 2015.

dk

Copy forwarded to

1.   Appellant
2.   Respondent
3.   CIT
4.   CIT(A)
5.   DR
                                             Dy. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting