Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 MSME Payment Rule in Tally Prime: Understanding the Law and Its Impact on Businesses in 2025 The MSME (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises) Payment Rule is a legal framework introduced under th
 Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF) 2025 26 Meaning, Purpose, and How to Manage It in Tally Prime
 GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Structure, Powers, and Its Relevance in Tally Prime Implementation
 How Tally Prime Supports the Real Estate & Construction Industry in India
 Comparison Between Tally Prime 6.1 and Tally Prime 6.2
 How Tally Prime Renewal Helps Save My Data
 Where to Buy Tally Prime 7.0 at the Best Rates Possible
 CBDT extends specified date for filing of various reports of audit for the Assessment Year 2025-26
 Tax audit deadline nears: Will Finance Ministry grant an extension?
 Are large income tax refunds getting delayed? Here s what you can do if you are yet to receive refund
 MSME Form 1 for Enhanced Reporting in Tally Prime Silver

Supreme Court stays levy of service tax on lawyers
August, 11th 2015

The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the Bombay high court order dismissing a challenge to the levy of service tax on lawyers.

A bench comprising chief justice H.L. Dattu, justice Amitava Roy and justice Arun Mishra tagged the matter with similar petitions before the apex court. It also stayed the high court order of 15 December.

High court bar associations from Andhra Pradesh, Guwahati, Chennai and Delhi have challenged the levy of service tax on lawyers as per Section 65 of the Finance Act, 2011. This provision seeks to levy service tax on fees paid by clients to lawyers.

Within four days of its introduction, it was stayed by the Delhi high court.

The petition, a copy of which Mint has reviewed, states that the imposition of the tax is oppressive, unjust, unreasonable and ultra vires (beyond legal authority) of the right to equality and freedom to carry on a trade or profession. It argues that the relationship between a client and lawyer must not be seen as that of a service provider and a client as the lawyer is merely a representative of his client.

The petition strongly condemned the hasty manner in which the Bombay high court had addressed the issue as the levy, being in the nature of a federal tax, could not vary in various jurisdictions.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting