« From the Courts » Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs  Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses  Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate  Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court  Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings  Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT  Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.  ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand  Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities  [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court  Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger  Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court «  N. Bharatvaja Shankar vs. UBS Bedi (Supreme Court)... CIT vs. M/s.Vandana Properties (Bombay High Court)... » MP HC asks state govt to secure high court, benches March, 31st 2012 Madhya Pradesh High Court today directed the state government to put in place adequate security at the high court and its benches at Indore and Gwalior. Acting on a petition, a division bench of Justice K K Lahoti and Justice T K Kaushal directed the government to prepare within one week an action-plan within on enhancing security of the high court. The petitioner advocate Pushpendrasingh Baghel said that in the absence of proper security, several incidents of crime had taken place on the court premises. He also said that a meeting of the committee of Home Law and other concerned departments was already held in this regard, while another is due shortly. The first meeting took few decisions on enhancing the security of the courts. The petitioner also said that according to the Supreme Court guidelines it is the state government responsibility to ensure adequate security at the courts and court premises. The bench directed the government to prepare the action-plan first for the main High Court at Jabalpur and later of its benches. PTI COR MAS NP